The UN has predicted that the world population will reach 9.6 billion by 2050–nearly 2.5 billion more people on Earth than we have at the moment. In 2013, the annual day in which humanity consumes more natural resources than the planet is capable of recovering from in a year came early, once again. Overpopulation also just happens to be one of those words that immediately triggers images of the apocalypse, despite the fact that nothing in human existence seems more routine than birthing a child. The world is not technically over populated there are areas that have a higher human density than what it should is the thing.
More people leads to greater human capital. If there are more people, the probability of finding a genius like Einstein, Marie Curie, Beethoven increase. These exceptional people can lead to technological and cultural masterpieces which enrich our lives. The establishment will have you believe the Earth is overpopulated when in fact it is just the opposite. Birth rates have noticeably declined over the last couple decades at the same time fertility rates are dropping. The rate dropped for moms of every major race and ethnicity, and in nearly age group, falling to the lowest point since federal health officials started tracking it more than a century ago. Today, the US fertility rate needed to maintain the current US population is 2.1 children per woman during her lifetime. Yet it now stands at only 1.9 and is falling, so we’re going backward.
The current population is at 7 billion yet remember that our economic system relies on a certain amount of people to carry out specific jobs yet people are retiring with no replacements. To keep this simple every woman needs to have 2 children to keep the population level. One to replace her one to replace the man. Since every woman needs to have 2 kids to maintain a stable population, if 3 women don’t have any, then one woman needs to have 8. This needs to be even higher in some parts of the world to make up for places with war, disease and famine. It is a mathematical equation and the sum is just the opposite of what we are taught to believe.
We are always taught the opposite to cover for something which in this case is the depopulation agenda. Recently the Georgia Guidestones “blew up” conveniently at the time people started catching on to the depopulation tactics happening all around. We are ingesting poisons from numerous sources all our lives yet few know this is done purposefully. There is an agenda to keep control of the population called Agenda 2030 formally known as Agenda 21. Agenda 21 is the United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs Division for Sustainable Development and has apparently developed as a means of restructuring the world population to lessen environmental impact and achieve an improved quality of life. One of the main ways of achieving this, however, is through encouraged and direct population control.
The United Nations and Philanthropists have taken it upon themselves to control the population. One club in general is called the ‘Good Club’ with big names and mandatory billionaires including Bill Gates, Warren Buffet, George Soros, Michael Bloomberg, and even Oprah Winfrey. A guest to the first meeting in the heart of NYC said “There was “nothing as crude as a vote” but a consensus emerged that they would back a strategy in which population growth would be tackled as a potentially disastrous environmental, social and industrial threat”. We are seen as a threat to the atmosphere when It is the powers that be that are polluting the Earth. Most damage to the Earth has been done by carelessness and greed. To name some incidences there is Fukushima, depleted Uranium in Iraq, and recent train derailments (that could have been prevented). Keep enjoying your cheeseburgers if you like it is not ruining the planet.
So, Overpopulation is in fact a myth to cover for the ‘Soft Kill” of all of us useless eaters called everyday people.
END
BONUS:
Bill Gates’s mathematical equation for
Gate’s description: “
The equation is: How many people are there? And that’s P, which today is about 7 billion, and will grow to be bigger than 9 billion.
Then you take how many energy-related services each person takes advantage of — that’s heating, cooling, transport, lighting. We call that S, and that will go up quite a bit as poor people in India are getting lighting, air conditioning, and refrigeration. The average number of services used by a person will increase, and it should — that’s a very good thing.
Then you have E, the energy used per service. In some areas, like lighting, that number can go down a lot. In some, like transport, planes, making fertilizer — those processes are extremely optimized, and so there’s not that much room to innovate on the energy-per-service front. Even if you’re optimistic about that, maybe you’ll get to 0.6. That is, 40 percent more efficient across all services.
And so if we take these first three factors — 7 billion going to 9 billion, double the services per person, and efficiency at about 0.6, that’s increasing [emissions].
The last factor is C, the carbon per unit of energy. And so if you multiply today, you get 36 billion tons. And if you multiply in the future, you need to get zero.
And so the first three factors are not going [to change] — the first one is going up; the second one, hopefully, is going up; the third one is going down, but not enough to offset those other two.
You have to take transport, industry, household, electricity — and, at least in the middle income and rich countries, put it into a zero emission mode”.
World Population Plan of Action here
1 Pingback