“The Transhuman ideology is so terrifying that most people just cannot grasp its enormity. Transhumans fully intend to hijack the evolutionary process of genetic structuring in order to create Humanity 2.0. This means treating human DNA like computer code”. ⁃ TN Editor
Definition
To define Transhumanism: Transhumanism is a way of thinking about the future based on the premise that the human species in its current form does not represent the end of our development but rather a comparatively early phase. Most people think the end of our species is “all bad dot com” but few out there not only rejoice in this idea but hasten its coming. We will refer to the ones who hasten the end of God’s image as the ‘Inorganic Ones’. These people have designed Human 2.0. Professor Hugh Herr of the MIT Media Lab describes “Human 2.0” – an era where technology will merge with our bodies and our minds to forever change our concept of human capability.
Look at Transhumanism as a form of totalitarian ambition to create a New World Order under a superconscious computer likened to God. While it may sound like science fiction, Google execs, scientists, computer engineers, and futurists have been advancing the cause of “technological singularity,” and the advent of superhuman intelligence, known as Transhumanism. The movement today is often called “h+”.
These inorganic ones caused a false flag where the boogeyman’ was an unseen virus with the antidote being a vaccine filled with ingredients only known to Transhumanists. How can we look at Transhumanism as a good thing when it came out of an evil agenda? The powers that be do not have a good track record with our well being. The urge to save humanity is almost always only a false-face for the urge to rule it. We simply shouldn’t trust it. Are we killing even more the belief in a god with this agenda? Famous philosopher Frederick Nietzche presumed the Age of Aquarius would make humans think God out of existence. Are we seeing phase two? It is a fact that what is sprayed into our skies are elements of the Transhumanist kind, and put into our pharmaceuticals is toxic to us. This is even spoken about in the Bible.
“We shape our technologies, then our technologies shape us” William Mitchell_The Cyborg self and the Networked Cities
Define Unholy Trinity: an intertwined bundle of socio-technological transformation processes that reveals itself as a trinity of datafication, algorithmization, and platformization. On the industry and politics side, this co-evolutionary trinity is driven by the belief in a scientifically and technologically controllable human evolution, reflected in the pursuit of nano-bio-info-cogno convergence, and accordingly linked to Transhumanism standing for this belief.
” The term “Transhuman” goes back to Jesuit priest, philosopher, and paleontologist Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, the “Catholic Darwin,” who through his postulation that man would create the Noosphere, a supreme consciousness, is often regarded as the patron saint of the internet. Teilhard applied the scientific concept of evolution to the Christian notion of spiritual rapture, believing that technology would bring about the ultimate spiritual evolution of mankind. According to him, this is the work of Christ. Teilhard’s beliefs also reconciled panpsychism, (Panpsychism is the view that all things have a mind or a mind-like quality. The word itself was coined by the Italian philosopher Francesco Patrizi in the sixteenth century and derives from the two Greek words pan (all) and psyche (soul or mind).) the idea that all matter is intelligent. He developed the Omega Point Theory, which posits that all the organisms on Earth will reach a higher evolutionary point by merging into one “Planetizen spirit.” Which I have found to be correlated with sustainability under Agenda 2030
The Omega Point is a supposed future when everything in the universe spirals toward a final point of unification.
a postulated sphere or stage of evolutionary development dominated by consciousness, the mind, and interpersonal relationships (frequently with reference to the writings of Teilhard de Chardin).
I have shaped myself mentally around the fact that a needed evolution is coming in a way similar to what Teilhard describes. Yet I can’t help but notice how the term Transhumanism then has been thwarted by our scientific community and pirated by Technocrats. Since the start of my typing on this subject I have found the Pope questioning the spiritual aspect of Teilhard read more on it here. I get it that Jesuits are not God’s soldiers but the Vatican’s which gives us a peek at the power behind it all. Did you know Fauci is a Jesuit? “My rights end where your arm begins”. is it more ambiguous if that arm is robotic? This is where we see the need for a whole new set of rights. Grave thought at a time when Transhumanist ideology is associated with a set of Technocratic peoples embedded into our government and are bent to take our freedoms.
Do we really want to mind-load ourselves to a computer chip, or recreate ourselves through algorithms? Should we leave our spirituality to computer engineers? We can’t pass the torch of evolution to mad scientists. The ‘Inorganic Ones’ see us as cancer to this Earth.
Even our political parties have one of a Transhumanist kind and had a runner in the 2016 campaign. This party was/is funded by wait for it…the FDA and Big Pharma. Zoltan Istvan Istvan was running for the Transhumanist Party. Istvan dreamt of achieving immortality and physical perfection through futuristic technologies like mind uploading, cyborg body augmentation, and genetic manipulation; they want us to evolve into a race of post-human super-beings. While the other presidential candidates were claiming they know best how to deal with Iran, the economy, and immigration, Istvan was trying to appeal to the US electorate with more ambitious goals like eradicating death, and for everyone in America to live forever.
Another interesting aspect is that a man who is looked up to by many politicians mostly on the Liberal side is famous Philosopher and Author Julian Huxley brother of Aldux Huxley. Julian has written famous papers called ‘Transhumanism‘ and ‘Evolution in Action’. Eugenics ties into Transhumanism through the selective breeding aspect. Julian Huxley gives the outline of what he believes future humanity could and should look like. Huxley, an Evolutionary Biologist came right out of an era of excitement for eugenics but also an enlightenmentness as seen in correspondence with others of his time like George Orwell. By pointing out the numerous limitations vulnerability, and feebleness that human nature is – at the time – prone to, and by confronting them with the possibilities humankind has, Huxley expresses the need to research and put into use all possible measures that would enable man to achieve utmost perfection. Technology is catching up with the dream of controlling an entire population of humans regardless of status or geolocation. To be realists we have to admit that it is not hard to see that this agenda will benefit rich elitists who search for immortality.
On the positive side, these technologies can prolong life and help people with specific health problems. The con is that we are already naturally evolving into more spiritual beings via God and the cosmos. The timing is weird for our transition by the unorganic ones due to the great awakening. Our God and the Cosmos already have us in transition in another direction altogether. Spiritual awakening does not benefit the machine though. Humans need to be better controlled after our current population reduction with vaccines plus these vaccines have the potential to operate our minds via 5G. Agenda 2030 will connect us all to our environments such as smart cities, cars, and devices through Government 2.0.
The First 2 Decades of the 21st Century will be the Golden Age of Biotechnology. Human Body 2.0 won’t be engineered all at once. It will be an incremental process and is well underway. Imagine creating Homosapien 2.0 through the use of technology from neuropharmacology to nanotechnology, genetic engineering, stem cell sciences, robotic assistance, brain-machine, and interfacing, all of the new fields of science that could have an application for human enhancement are important to the Transhumanist movement. We already have the means to survive without eating using intravenous nutrition. Nanobots will replace our body’s organs. After the change, the term is referred to as ‘Post-Human’. All of this is either completed or expected to be by 2030. Does this date ring a bell? Is it any surprise to anyone that our robotic replacements will be taxed?
A breakdown of the mechanics of Human 2.0 would involve every system of the body using reverse engineering. Much is done through nanobots or nanomedicine, for instance, blood cells will be replaced by nanobots. Imagine programmable blood cells allowing us to be underwater for hours at a time without coming up for air. Next the heart, this organ will be able to replace entirely, so all together most organs can be replaced except our skin, including our skeletal system which will be strong, stable, and self-repairing. Next up and most complicated is of course the brain. Look at it as two possible beings 1. Humans with enhanced brains via a chip 2. Robots with sentient capabilities. Both of which have the potential for the disarrangement of mankind. What are our priorities as a species that we are spending so much time, energy, and money on being able to scarf down junk food without health repercussions before world hunger is eliminated? Their desire to transcend humans will end up excusing too much bad behavior on their part. Dehumanisation 2.0 is more like it.
Some people have already dealt with obsolete body parts mainly eyes. Their surgery was complete but the company making these robotic eyes went bankrupt. These people need individual rights. When it comes to ethics we the little people do not decide what scientific advances are accepted. In all actuality, this change in human advancement is inevitable so in realistic terms setting up those in charge of any failure to be held responsible for their action. Medical malpractice is already a significant problem without these advancements.
Vaccines and Transhumanism:
An important question to ask: Are we less likely to value human life when we could act out a sex theme with a robot with no regard? Is bionic life an interaction with people and cyborgs a gateway for devices worse to come? Will we respect humans less? The first human action industry to prepare for what’s to come was sex working robots in a cyber brothel. We will be seduced into this idea through the fun of gaming and convenience, etc.
They are wanting to transition people into something else but ultimately, they want humans to become post-human. The “posthuman” is an umbrella term frequently used in a number of theoretical discourses. It is difficult to find a definition of the term that is shared by all the different approaches that use it since “posthuman” seems to denote a very diverse group of phenomena, some ongoing and others only predicted or imagined. The “posthuman” is used to describe modes of being resulting from potential enhancements to human nature generated through applied science and technological developments. Something that has become so radically altered from what we are today as to no longer even be considered to be human and they imagine creating Homosapien 2.0 through the use of technology. From neuropharmacology to nanotechnology, genetic engineering, stem cell sciences, robotic assistance, brain-machine, and interfacing, are all new fields of science. As you will notice as well scientific fields are combing as well
This is where I will bring up the caduceus.
- an ancient Greek or Roman herald’s wand, typically one with two serpents twined around it, carried by the messenger god Hermes or Mercury.
- a representation of this, traditionally associated with our medical system and healing.
This symbol, deeper than most can explain is the 99% of the population’s stronghold when it comes to not only western medicine but our body’s connection alchemically to Transhumanism. no one could explain this better than ODDTV. So out of getting the best understanding, I refer you to his video here…. crucial to a deeper understanding for you. I would transcribe but it is deep and this message might be lost.
I hope I have answered some questions for you regarding this topic. As much as it is exciting, Transhumanism as an ideology in great question for futurists, theologians, scientists, doctors, and anybody with an inkling of sci-fi. I do need to add the realistically all this futureness is coming and lets face it, those benefitting from Transhumanism will be Just because this topic is sexy doesn’t mean we settle for its existence. Next topic on the menu is Generational Trauma. I talked about fixing world hunger before finding new ways to consume, yet I left out the importance of giving a new upgrade to the human body while it’s people are literally traumatized. In between this and part two I will post be researching for you ‘Generational Trauma’.
This topic however will continue in an upcoming post regarding the digitalization of our economy linked to each individual similar to China’s system. Canada has already rolled out universal base income through a passed bill of legislation. Also, I will touch more on the mental aspect of Transhumanism in part two.
More Important Questions to Ask:
Questions to Ask:
Why are vaccines being forced?
Why does God’s image need to be distorted?
Why blackmail us into vaccinations?
Why is Graphene being pushed into us right after 5G towers are installed?
How does Graphene make us absorb 5G?
If the reason we have produced technology is geared toward war did the reasoning change?
Who decides what are enhancements and what are the limitations?
Do robots need human rights?
Related terms and definitions listed or not listed above:
Transfection: What is transfection? Broadly defined, transfection is the process of artificially introducing nucleic acids (DNA or RNA) into cells, utilizing means other than viral infection.
Bio-MEMS: is an abbreviation for biomedical microelectromechanical systems. Bio-MEMS have considerable overlap and are sometimes considered synonymous, with lab-on-a-chip and micro total analysis systems.
Genetic Engineering: the deliberate modification of the characteristics of an organism by manipulating its genetic material.
Crispr Gene: CRISPR gene editing is a genetic engineering technique in molecular biology by which the genomes of living organisms may be modified. It is based on a simplified version of the bacterial CRISPR-Cas9 antiviral defense system
Mind Uploading: Mind uploading is a speculative process of whole brain emulation in which a brain scan is used to completely emulate the mental state of the individual in a digital computer
Body Augmentation: Body modification is the deliberate altering of the human anatomy or human physical appearance.
Summary of Key Insights on Transhumanism
- Definition and Vision:
- Transhumanism seeks to enhance and transform human beings by merging biology with technology, aiming for “Human 2.0.”
- It treats human DNA as programmable code, proposing advancements like genetic modification, neural interfaces, and nanotechnology.
- Technological Goals:
- Includes technologies such as CRISPR gene editing, mind uploading, and body augmentation to achieve post-human states.
- Envisions replacing biological systems with engineered ones, including programmable organs and nanobots for cellular functions.
- Philosophical Roots:
- Inspired by thinkers like Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, who believed technology could elevate human consciousness to a “planetary spirit.”
- Related concepts include panpsychism (mind-like qualities in all matter) and the “Omega Point,” a unification of consciousness.
- Criticism and Concerns:
- Critics link it to dehumanization, loss of spiritual identity, and ethical dilemmas regarding control and coercion.
- Raises questions about whether humans should cede aspects of evolution to technocrats and algorithms.
- Concerns over a transhumanist agenda tied to population control and centralized power, often linked to Agenda 2030.
- Ethical and Social Impacts:
- Risks include eroding human rights, unequal access to enhancements, and redefining societal values around humanity.
- Controversies over vaccines and nanotechnology being potential tools for control and transhumanist experimentation.
- Futuristic Aspirations and Risks:
- Projects advancements by 2030, including smart cities and fully integrated human-technology ecosystems.
- Warns against potential dystopian outcomes, such as surveillance states and elitist control of enhancements.
- Key Questions Raised:
- How should humanity define and regulate enhancement technologies?
- Should robots or enhanced beings have rights?
- Are these advancements aligned with humanity’s spiritual and ethical needs, or do they subvert them?
ADDITIONAL READING:
Transhumanist Manifesto here
Ray Kurzweil Reader pdf, an American computer scientist, author, inventor, and futurist. A collection of Essays here
The New mRNA COVID Vaccines Inject an Operating System into Your Body – Not a Conspiracy Theory, Moderna Admits It here
Hybrid World_The Plan to Modify and Control the Human Race here
Human Body Version 2.0 by Lifeboat Foundation here
Elon Musk’s Neuralink Brain Implant Could Begin Human Trials In 2023 here
Catherine Austin Fitts Explains how the Globalist Billionaires and Technocrats are Planning on Taking Over the Planet, and How We Can Stop It video on Bitchute here. Article here
Do Cosmic Rays Evolve Consciousness and Transform DNA? here
How to Remove Graphene from Vaccines Out of the Body here
Graphene Has an Absorption Band Through 5G here
Nanomedicine by the Foresight Institute here
ADDITIONAL IMAGES:
3 Pingbacks