“She gives herself to her husband and children and is fulfilled by seeing them thrive and receiving their love, respect and gratitude. A woman makes this supreme sacrifice to only one man who will cherish her and provide for his family. Men instinctively want to fulfill this responsibility. This is the essence of the heterosexual contract (i.e. marriage): female power in exchange for male power expressed as love. Sex is the symbol of this exclusive bond. Marriage and family may not be for everyone but it is the natural path for most.”
~Henry Makow
Then this idea was changed Feminism was introduced into society. None of which was pushed with a genuine concern for women’s rights. It actually created so the snake oil peddling Rockefellers could earn taxes from both sexes. As plain and simple as that. The fact that everything we were taught about events in life was lies, makes this no different leaving us on a time-consuming path to find real answers. Once again swindled by another Rockefeller agenda.
Media was their tool with help from Tavistock’s social engineering machine. We see this in the ‘Torches for Freedom’ campaign headed by Sigmund Freud’s nephew Edward Bernays’ helping woman gain independence through the once frowned upon idea of cigarette smoking. Propaganda posters and ads for female smoking were everywhere. Human psychology was used by Bernays’ to achieve this task.
We should be furious about one man affecting our family traditions for profit. Additionally, Feminism was used for a Communist agenda. Recognize the term “Divide and Conquer”? We are much easier to control with the family unit broken. Same reason race wars are pushed, united we stand divided we fall.
Another benefit for the Elite party in Feminism was with women at work the State acquires our children at a younger age in public education in what I like to call government indoctrination centers. This was 𝗽𝗹𝗮𝗻𝗻𝗲𝗱. The mess we see in the family structures across most of the planet was a strategic move to gain more power for very greedy individuals. By Elite for the benefit of the Elite.
Why was the woman’s place being in the home such a bad thing? Marriage being pushed as oppression is not okay. Women have motherly instincts for a reason. Women also have a heightened sense of smell to be able to nurture and protect their children. Why have a baby and then have someone else raise it? It is the qualities of both men and woman that when brought together make us whole.
I am in no way saying that equal rights should not have happened. We are equal to what we bring to the table. The movement pushed by the Rockefeller Foundation was bad and we are all still suffering the repercussions. After Feminism was set in place, we saw the push for children to disobey their parents, now what are we seeing…Toxic Masculinity. I didn’t see anyone complaining about this while men were off killing people in other countries in the name of “freedom”. I mean gold, oil, and drugs. Men are being emasculated and this is all throwing off the balance of nature. I understand the concept of how hurtful it is to tell your son to “be a man” and “real men don’t cry”. This is not what I am talking about. I am talking about things like the Boy Scouts being ruined. The only thing that should’ve changed about the Boy Scouts was the removal of pedophilic leaders. (Boy Scouts link) I am talking about feminism being a guise to hate on men. I am talking about families being destroyed for profit.
I like to keep my blogs short and to the point. To be able to see the things you thought of as normal events having a different light on them. To know I am bringing you the truth, research the fact that the CIA funded MS Magazine as a part of these efforts to change society during the time that our shadow leaders wanted to be able to tax both sexes.
“I was thrilled with how the CIA paid me to infiltrate our culture”
~Gloria Steinem
“Emasculating and degrading men was the right thing to do, but we should have left a little bit of dignity in men so that they were still useful to us”.
~Gloria Steinem
Something I would like to point out in the women’s movement is a few of the hypocrisies involved for example Condoleezza Rice former Secretary of State for the U.S and an American diplomat, political scientist, civil servant, and professor who is the current Director of the Hoover Institution at Stanford University has been active in this movement and movements for violence against women, yet was a chief Propagandist in the selling of the hoax of Saddam Hussein having weapons of mass destruction leading to the war in Iraq to which thousands of women and children were killed. To her possible defense though she herself might have been fooled on the idea of Hussein having such weapons?
Another is Hillary Clinton’s supposed belief in helping to save women from violence unless the violence came from her husband. When this happened she dragged these women through the mud to fit her agenda. Much more on Hillary in the future, you can bet on that.
2 Pingbacks